|
The
Times Saturday 26/3/1921.
DEATH OF MR MARCUS STONE RA. A FRIEND OF DICKENS.
We regret to announce the death of Mr Marcus Stone RA, which took
place at his home in Melbury Road, Kensington. He had been in failing
health for the last few years. His wife had predeceased him, and he
left no issue.The
death of Mr Stone removes a characteristic painter of the Victorian
School, whose works, it used to be affirmed were to be seen in every
print-sellers shop window in Europe.
Born
in 1840, Marcus Stone was the son of Frank Stone ARA, himself an able
painter, and was the cherished friend of Charles Dickens and his circle,
and the acquaintance of many famous and interesting men of the day.
The bright and precocious boy was thrust, even before he entered his
teens, into this delightful company, who spoilt and encouraged him
and looked with interest at his early artistic efforts. Chief of these
friends was Dickens, who claimed from the little fellow a spirited
sketch of Poor Jo on which he was engaged, and who, a few years later,
urged Longman, the publisher, to secure the young man's services as
illustrator. "He is an admirable draughtsman" wrote Dickens, who had
a keen and just appreciation of artistic capacity, " he has a most
dextrous hand, a charming sense of grace and beauty, and a capital
power of observation," advising him to specialise in that line. The
praise, even at that time, was not undeserved. Although Marcus Stone
did not follow-up the recommendation he became more than ever a welcome
guest at Gadshill. It was, then, under the aegis of Charles Dickens
that Marcus Stone began his career as an illustrator in black and
white. As early as 1861 he drew the frontispiece for "Little Dorrit"
and in the following year he was called upon to illustrate "Our Mutual
Friend" and those drawings, together with his contributions to London
Society, Cornhill, and The Sunday Magazine, and other remarkable pages
noteworthy among the wood-engravings of the sixties displayed a freedom
of execution having little in common with Stone's handling of the
brush. The artist himself regarded them with modified satisfaction;
he considered then to be immature, and turned to colour and devoted
himself solely to painting. If his claim be well-founded, to him draughtsmen
were indebted for the innovation of illustrations being drawn upon
paper, then photographed onto the block for the engraver to cut, thus
abolishing the wasteful practice of drawing on the wood itself.
PICTORIAL
STORY-TELLING
Mr Stone's pretty talent for pictorial story telling, so much esteemed
in his day, was first devoted to domestic genre and historical anecdote,
English and French, with mildly dramatic scenes inspired by the English
poets, especially such as were tenderly emotional and well restrained
in passion. Mr Stone would invariably contrive his subjects so that
they sprang at a glance to the eye and mind of the spectator and made
an instant and graceful appeal with unerring directness. In this category
were his earliest pictures "Rest" 1858, "Silent Pleading" 1859, "The
Sword of the Lord" 1860, "Claudio deceived by Don Juan" 1860. About
the year of 1860 he changed his class of subject, and in some measure
his style, for the pictures of pure sentiment by which he made himself
famous, and in which their almost feminine qualities of grace and
elegance took the general public by storm. Pictures such as "Ily'en
toujours un autre" (Chantry Bequest), "In Love, A Honeymoon, A Passing
Cloud, A Peacemaker, Two's Company Three's None, Her First Sorrow"
and the like.
UNIQUE ACADEMY RECORD
In spite of the limitations and uneventfullness of his own method
Mr Marcus Stone's sympathies in art were broad and his knowledge of
foreign schools was wide beyond what is common among painters of his
day. He was an acute critic, strong in his opinions, and a militant
Radical, alike in both politics and religion. His life was a curiously
successful one, as success is sometimes measured, and it may be regarded
as unique in its way; from his first appearance on the walls of the
Royal Academy, when he was eighteen, he never to the end missed a
single exhibition-he never had a picture rejected-and while he was
still painting he never was "hung" but on the line-and every picture
had been sold before it was seen. Little wonder he scarcely exhibited
a dozen pictures at other institutions. Marcus Stone was a man of
distinguished and pleasing appearance and manner, a good talker, a
clever phrase-maker, and an omniverous reader. His memory was prodigious,
and his claim that he could re-hang from memory most Royal Academy
Exhibitions of his time was hardly a vain one, and he never forgot
a picture, or the painter of it once seen.
He was elected ARA in 1877, and RA in 1887. In the "Ode to the Arts
Club" a Royal Academy Exhibition night as celebrated at the club in
1892 Marcus Stone was thus presented: Marcus Apollo Belvedere Stone
Stands there erect in all his glory shown; A subtle kerchief special
grace imparts, Fatal to feline as to female hearts, No hand's more
cunning with a brush to trace The lines of beauty upon a virgin's
face; Or mark the passion that her breast must fill. If Sylvia's Lord
bends not to Sylvia's will, Nor are the dreaded fates to him unkind-
Buyers abound; for in his scenes they find A sunset suggestion of
their youthful loves- And soft green foliage of our English Groves.
The portrait here drawn was accepted as true by the boon companions
for whom the poem was written; Marcus Stone, lover of arts and cats,
devotee of gentlemanly Attire, and his own elegance and refinement
lived for them in the genial lines which they cordially applauded.
The funeral service will be held at St Mary Abbots Kensington at 11
o'clock on Tuesday.
MY
COMMENTS
I had not realised that Marcus Stone's work was so popular until researching
him for the short biography on my web site, and locating this obituary.
His pictures are often set in the Regency, when the fashions for both
men and women were regarded by the Victorians (rightly), as being
far more elegant than their own. Stone's fancy pictures are well-observed
and painted, and his characterisation of their subjects is excellent,
as is his rendering of light and shade and vegetation. I have been
amused to learn that the painter of such pictures was such an iconoclast,
political radical, and religious freethinker. PHR. 1/7/2002.
|